Cardiology Research - Fitness, Heart Disease, Medications

Cardiology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Cardiology, including details on fitness, heart disease, medications.


Cardiology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Cardiology

Books on Cardiology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The impact of patient-specific quality-of-care report cards on guideline adherence in heart failure.

Matthews JC, Johnson ML, Koelling TM

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if physician education through heart failure (HF) patient-specific quality-of-care report cards (HFRC) impacts outpatient HF guideline adherence. METHODS: A prospective pre-post design study was performed to test the hypothesis that a one-time, patient-specific HFRC delivered to physicians after HF patient (ejection fraction < or = 40%) discharge would lead to improved HF guideline adherence compared with control practitioners. Patients were contacted at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge to assess medication usage and intolerances. Six month quality score (QS) was the primary end point, calculated as the sum of adherence to 4 medication performance measures (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, aldosterone inhibitors, and warfarin for atrial fibrillation). RESULTS: The mean QS at discharge was 3.10 +/- 0.78 in controls (n = 189) and 3.25 +/- 0.79 in the HFRC group (n = 76, P = .11). Controlling for discharge QS, the HFRC resulted in a significantly improved QS at 3 months (beta = .11, P = .023) but not at the 6-month primary end point (beta = .084, P = .14). Controlling for baseline medication use, patients of practitioners receiving the HFRC were 32.5 (P = .019) and 8.5 (P = .030) times more likely to receive, or have a documented contraindication to, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker at 3 and 6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in indicated beta-blocker, aldosterone inhibitor, or warfarin prescriptions at any follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although one-time patient-specific report cards result in short-term statistically significant improvements in outpatient evidence-based HF care, the gain does not translate into sustained improvements in quality of care.

Published 23 November 2007 in Am Heart J, 154(6): 1174-83.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Cardiology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Cardiology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Cardiology Books

Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography

Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography